Quality management is more than recording inspection results. When a deviation occurs, the system can raise a non-conformance, hold the affected unit, and keep the entire history in a record that can be verified.
Every deviation has a clear process from start to finish. Status changes are recorded, and closing one requires a signature where the rules demand it.
| Stage | What happens |
|---|---|
| Open | Recorded by an operator, or created automatically when a data collection result falls outside specification. |
| Under review | The team triages severity, the non-conformance code, and the affected units. |
| Investigation | The root cause is traced and supporting evidence is recorded on the same record. |
| Disposition | Decide the action, whether use as-is, rework, reprocess, scrap, or reject, with QA sign-off where required. |
| Closed | The non-conformance is closed with a signature, and its entire history remains in the audit trail. |
What QA and compliance teams usually want settled first.
No. If a data collection result falls outside specification, the system can raise a non-conformance automatically. At critical severity, the affected unit goes on hold immediately.
No. The audit trail is designed append-only, so it provides no edit or delete path. That is part of the system design, not a permission that can be reconfigured.
From the finished product back to the raw material lots used, including through splits and merges, and then forward again to the destinations or units that consumed that material.