This is where the VECHR foundation is built: how plants, areas, work centers, and equipment are modelled, who is allowed to do what, and how master data is governed without losing the trail of any change.
Equipment is more than an asset list. VECHR models it in a hierarchy that follows ISA-95 principles, so scheduling, access control, and performance reporting can all work from the same structure.
| Level | What lives there |
|---|---|
| Plant | A single manufacturing site or location. You can run many plants on one platform, each with its own address, calendar, and contact details. |
| Area | Areas can be nested as deeply as needed, from a building down to a production line and a cell. Storage locations can also be modelled, with capacity and utilization you can monitor. |
| Work Center | A unit of work representing production capacity, usable in planning, scheduling, and costing. |
| Resource Group | A set of resources that can serve as capacity options in dispatch and scheduling. For example, a job that can run on any one of three available mixers. |
| Resource | The actual equipment: a machine, a tank, or a pump, complete with its states, meters, and any IIoT connections. |
Because this structure is shared, context stays consistent across the system. The line you scheduled against is the same line you see in OEE and the same line you scope access control to.
The questions that usually come up as IT and QA teams start mapping the plant structure.
No limit is set in the model. You can run many plants and nest areas to match each site's structure. Multi-plant is part of the platform structure, not a feature that only arrives after an upgrade.
Yes. Permissions can be set per plant, so a user can hold a different role at each site, supervisor at one plant and read-only at another, for instance.
No. VECHR uses ISA-95 as a model for describing the structure your plant already has. The goal is not to force you to reorganise, but to give you a consistent structure so scheduling, OEE, access control, and everything else can share the same context.